Conservative Author Claims Presidential Pardon Will Not Protect Anthony Fauci For CONvid-1984 Crimes - But It Could - Here's Why

Article posted with permission from the author, Suzanne Hamner

A recent article in The Gateway Pundit, authored by Paul S. Gardiner, contends that a presidential pardon cannot shield Anthony S. Fauci, former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) from state prosecution concerning the “criminality and financial incentives concerning hospital COVID deaths”.

Regardless of a presidential pardon, Dr. Anthony Fauci remains subject to possible prosecution for violations of state criminal codes that he (and other named officials) allegedly committed during the COVID-19 pandemic.

On behalf of hundreds of aggrieved families of lost loved ones during the pandemic, extensive legal briefs requesting criminal investigations of alleged state crimes have been submitted by the Vires Law Group, West Palm Beach, FL, to attorneys general in Florida, Louisiana, Texas, Oklahoma, and Missouri. (View the Texas filing here.)

• Buy All-American!
• Bring health and vitality back to your body with these non-transdermal patches
• Get your Vitamin B17 & Get 10% Off With Promo Code TIM
• How To Protect Yourself From 5G, EMF & RF Radiation – Use promo code TIM to save $$$
• The Very Best All-American Made Supplements On The Maret
• Grab This Bucket Of Heirloom Seeds & Save with Promo Code TIM
• Here’s A Way You Can Stockpile Food For The Future
• Stockpile Your Ammo & Save $15 On Your First Order
• Preparing Also Means Detoxifying – Here’s One Simple Way To Detoxify
• The Very Best Chlorine Dioxide
• All-American, US Prime, High Choice Grass-Fed Beef with NO mRNA, hormones or antibiotics… ever!

This article identifies some of the huge financial payments (bonuses) paid to hospitals during the pandemic.

Further, it is believed that these payments served as motivation to encourage the extensive use of the toxic drug remdesivir as well as end-of-life ventilators for many COVID-19 patients.

Additionally, the coercion of attending physicians (and nurses) by hospital administrators and other officials to “go along” with toxic treatments of COVID-19 patients is described.

Regarding remdesivir, the recent testimony of Dr. David Martin before members of the Oklahoma state legislature (view here for short video) is daunting to say the least.

If you read my book, “Informed Consent: An Unalienable Right”, the introduction discussed at length the PREP Act and the 21^st Century CARES Act. Both of these laws have been used in the past by the federal government to shield individuals operating from prosecution for administering a medical intervention identified as a “covered countermeasure”. Worse, judges have upheld the provisions by the federal government, meaning “a covered person shall be immune from suit and liability under Federal and State law with respect to all claims for loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the administration to or the use by an individual of a covered countermeasure.” So, in essence, the PREP Act negated any State law that could be used to prosecute those who knowingly administered these emergency “covered” interventions regardless of the knowledge the interventions would cause harm.

The only exception is engaging in willful misconduct.

This situation is reminiscent of the actions that occurred in Nazi Germany during the Holocaust. While Adolf Hitler issued the order, Eichmann made the trains run on time, and Himmler staffed the concentration death camps with Gestapo, it was every individual under these three evil wicked men who actually performed the actions who were guilty of the murders of millions. The majority of the individuals responsible were never tried or held accountable at the Nuremberg Trials. Hitler, Eichman, and Himmler, along with other high-ranking German officials were culpable for certain in the murder of millions, the defense for the individuals perpetrating the actions was “I was just following orders”. That defense didn’t work after World War II, but how many were actually prosecuted compared to how many participated?

And, so it is with every doctor, nurse, hospital administration, medical board member, and any other individual who administered the CONvid-1984 protocols handed down by Fauci et. al. Gardiner even admits as much in his article.

Defendants of their actions in administering remdesivir will undoubtedly claim that their actions were in accord with the October 2020 FDA Emergency Use Approval (EUA) for remdesivir to be used in treating COVID patients.

But because the toxic effects of the drug were widely known prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and because there are serious questions about the validity of the EUA, officials supporting and administering the drug to COVID patients who later died may find themselves charged with first- and second-degree murder and/or involuntary manslaughter at a minimum.

Further, these officials will have to explain why they promoted and allowed the continued use of remdesivir when in November 2020, the World Health Organization recommended against the use of remdesivir in treating Covid-19 patients!

Two questions arise: why would physicians violate their Hippocratic Oath to do no harm to patients entrusted to their care by knowingly administering a highly toxic drug to their patients? Why would hospital administrators and healthcare policymakers advocate and require remdesivir to treat COVID-19 victims?

Regarding the first question, a highly creditable physician source states that if an attending physician or family doctor tried to administer known effective treatments such as ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine, that doctor was threatened with a loss of his medical license and/or loss of hospital privileges.

Thus, many, if not most, physicians (and nurses) made the decision to “go along” with hospital protocols (established by Dr. Anthony Fauci) requiring the use of remdesivir even though they knew or should have known that the drug was highly toxic, leading to or contributing to a patient’s death.

Regarding the second question, the financial incentives (bonus payments) awarded to hospitals by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid and other federal agencies were huge.

Hospital administrators, in general, found it impossible (in their minds) to refuse to accept these payments, which led to hospital administrations either directly or indirectly encouraging that a) patients be coded with the COVID-19 virus; b) be treated with remdesivir; and c) be put on ventilators long enough, frequently resulting in death, to receive a substantial bonus for this action.

States took the side of the federal government as is indicated in the treatment of doctors and nurses who dissented regarding the top-down treatment “mandates” concerning CONvid-1984. Many lost their licenses and their jobs. Hospitals also went along with the “treatment plan”. While Fauci et. al. are guilty of the same crimes as Hitler, Eichmann, and Himmler, the masses of doctors, nurses, administrators, state officials, and others are guilty of perpetrating the actions that comprised the crime. Holding Fauci et. al. responsible for crimes is certainly appropriate; however, those who participated in the actions have to be held responsible as well. If not, the perpetrators receive immunity for murder, pre-meditated murder, second-degree murder, and manslaughter.

Taking these actions against all perpetrators is necessary to secure the liberty and freedom of the people. Remember, the hospital administrators and health care providers (doctors, nurses, aides, etc.) had a choice. Many chose to go along to get along – wrongly. If they did not, the State, in the form of medical boards, threatened the licenses of these individuals and hospitals threatened loss of their jobs. One can also include State legislators as complicit because of their failure to nullify unconstitutional actions by the federal government, protect the healthcare providers legitimately practicing medicine according to moral, ethical, and legal standards, and reign in out-of-control governors who implemented strict guidelines surrounding the planned scam-demic of CONvid-1984.

The actions by all involved are criminal, no doubt. However, there is no State attorney general that will decimate the medical-industrial complex by holding all perpetrators accountable. The federal government, unlawfully and unconstitutionally, violated the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution for the united States of America by denying the States the right to institute laws concerning murder and medical malpractice/negligence, usurping State authority during the CONvid-1984 scam-demic. In essence, the federal government, through the PREP Act – used unlawfully for civilian purposes, provided healthcare providers a license to kill with impunity. Moreover, the federal government violated Article IV, Section 4 by failing to guarantee every State in the union a republican form of government. States, and the attorney generals, complied with the federal government.

These lawsuits now filed will challenge the entire management of the CONvid-1984 planned scam-demic conspiracy – and it is a conspiracy still being perpetrated.  However, a presidential pardon, violating the Constitution, can still shield Fauci, et. al. from prosecution. Don’t forget that healthcare providers have been violating the proper informed consent process for decades regarding certain medical interventions – vaccines being the most prominent example – with impunity. Fold into the recipe the atrocious Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare, which instituted a “top-down” form of “approved care”, accepted by the States against the Constitution and by medical professionals in violation of their moral and ethical code, and Fauci et. al has a proverbial “get out of jail” free card.

Gardiner is echoing much of the thoughts of many who witnessed the conspiracy, criminality, corruption, and lawlessness that occurred during the CONvid-1984 planned scam-demic. Justice should come against all participants. It is justice that guards our liberties. But, the wickedness of man is great and the people are content to suffer when they consider the evils sufferable than to right the wrongs by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.

Many believe now that Trump has been elected president, things will change. Conveniently, these people forget it was Trump who instituted “Operation Warp Speed” and gave Fauci et. al. free reign (intentional) during the planned scam-demic. The PREP Act, passed in December 2005, is still in play to protect all those involved, unconstitutional as it is, with all States being complicit with compliance.

As a reminder, no one at the Internal Revenue Service, including Lois Lerner, was held responsible for targeting conservative patriot groups. Hillary Clinton got off scot-free for her many violations of the law, including the Benghazi debacle. Brennan and Comey walked free. No one was held accountable for Fast and Furious. Obama walked free as well as Feinstein, Pelosi, Boehner, McConnell, Reid, Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, and a host of others who committed crimes against the people. Crimes committed during the CONvid-1984 involve so many more and filter down to the healthcare providers as well as international non-governmental organizations and private individuals, such as Bill Gates.

It will be business as usual following standard operating procedure – the people be damned.

Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media