Giới thiệu: thân gửi các bạn, tôi đã tìm được văn bản chuyển dịch của video rất quan trọng về người cá mà chương trình Animal Planet thực hiện, câu chuyện cho thấy những bằng chứng mạnh mẽ khẳng định rằng người cá đang tồn tại dưới lòng đại dương và có tác động đến động vật dưới đó như: săn bắt và bị săn. Những bằng chứng được liên kết từ quá khứ tới hiện tại để người xem thấy có sự tương đồng về dữ liệu, sự kiện.

Do thời gian không nhiều nên tôi đề nghị bạn, đặc biệt nhóm Thư viện hoàng kim giúp đỡ để chuyển dịch toàn bộ video này sang subviet, sau khi thực hiện video, bản quyền chuyển dịch sẽ thuộc về các bạn.

Cảm ơn rất nhiều và xin các bạn hãy gửi tin nhắn này đến các bạn Thư viện hoàng kim,

Zero
Thân,


Người cá khắc trên các hang động cổ

Người cá được quay thấy dưới lòng đại dương

Người cá được cho là thật

Text of the video(*)

Are mermaids real?

and if so, where’s the evidence? 

one year ago, 

animal planet first aired “mermaids: the body found” 

and left people wondering these questions and more.

I’m john frankel, and in two hours, 

i’ll be interviewing dr. paul robertson, 

the lead scientist from the film you’re about to see, 

as we will share compelling new evidence 

that has come to light for the first time since the film aired.

we will begin immediately following this broadcast, 

so sit tight, stay tuned, and we’ll see you in two hours.

dr. robertson: as a scientist, 

i was never a believer of conspiracy theories.

i believe al-qaeda 

was responsible for the 9/11 attacks.

i believe we’ve landed on the moon.

and i believe oswald shot jfk.

[ siren wailing ] 

[ beeps ] 

okay.

yeah, to believe our government covered up these events 

requires proof.

a conspiracy theory, like any theory, needs proof.

so that’s the first question i’d ask me.

“where’s your proof?” 

in 1997, scientists from noaa 

recorded a sound in the deep pacific.

it’s thought to be organic in nature 

and has never been identified.

it’s called the bloop.

[ howling, chattering ] 

in the early 2000s, it was proved 

that the navy beached whales while testing sonar weapons.

for years, the navy denied that they were responsible 

for these beachings.

these are facts.

and in some of the incidents, 

there were reports of something else washing up with the whales.

in 2004, two boys were the first to arrive 

on a mass whale beaching in washington state.

[ birds cawing ] 

they captured it on a cellphone.

the boys claim they saw something that day.

they — they claim they saw a body.

[ boy screams ] 

and they went on record claiming that they saw a body.

that official record was later changed, 

and the navy took the remains of what the boys found.

i know this because i was part of the team 

investigating that beaching and what the navy did that day, 

and i believe i know what it is that they took.

narrator: moclips beach, washington state, 

april 4, 2004 – 

the site of the largest mass whale beaching 

in united states history.

a seattle-based research team 

from the national oceanic and atmospheric administration 

is quickly on the scene 

to investigate the cause of the mass beaching.

heading the research 

was respected marine biologist dr. brian mccormick.

in 2000, mccormick had published a landmark study 

that linked mass whale beachings 

to experimental navy sonar-weapons testing.

it led to the program’s suspension that same year.

dr. mccormick and his team suspected that the navy 

had begun operating their sonar once more.

now two members of that team 

have agreed to speak on camera for the first time 

about what they claim the navy discovered 

but has never disclosed.

dr. robertson: i remember looking out over the dunes, 

and the scale was incredible.

i’d never seen anything like it.

my name’s paul robertson.

i was a research assistant with dr. mccormick, 

working at noaa for several years by then.

by the time we got there, the wind was so bad 

that it had driven everyone else off the beach, 

and a storm was coming in, so it was just us and the navy.

they’d cordoned off a section of beach, 

and there were guys in hazmat suits.

it could have been biologists or medical staff.

we weren’t sure, but that got our attention.

dr. davis: brian was one of the first scientists 

to draw a connection 

between the mass beachings and navy sonar use.

he was the most experienced in these events, 

but even he had never seen anything like this before.

[ camera shutter clicking ] 

i’m rebecca davis.

i was a field biologist at noaa.

i was working in the marine-mammals division 

before i joined dr. mccormick’s lab in 1999.

blood was visible coming from the ears of the whales.

we had never seen that before, 

where every whale was bleeding from the ears.

this meant that they had all suffered 

some kind of major internal trauma.

we took multiple organ tissue samples 

and we were going to study those under the microscope 

to determine cause of death.

dr. robertson: we packed up as quickly as we could.

but brian wouldn’t leave.

he wanted to get as many samples as he could 

because he wanted to know what the navy was doing out there.

after the navy left, 

we went down to where they’d been working, 

and none of the animals had been cut open.

they hadn’t been autopsied.

we had no idea what they would be doing down there.

[ howling, chattering ] 

narrator: in prior beachings where the navy was implicated, 

the noaa team found whales 

that had died from suffocation injuries.

it is believed the loud sound of the navy’s sonar 

scared the whales into the shallows, 

where they stranded themselves.

without water to support their massive weight, 

the whales’ internal organs collapsed, 

slowly suffocating them.

that’s what the noaa team expected to find 

in the autopsy remains – 

signs of internal-organ collapse.

they found something else instead.

when we looked at the samples, 

we expected to see evidence of trauma.

the bleeding from the ears indicated as much.

what we were not prepared for was the extent.

the internal organs hadn’t collapsed.

what we were seeing 

was consistent with blunt force trauma.

there were circular lesions on the samples.

clear evidence of damage.

and these were in every sample that we’d taken.

brian had an immediate theory — infrasound.

very powerful ultra-low-frequency sound waves 

that could theoretically be weaponized 

and potentially be used to devastating effect.

they would slam into living tissue 

with incredible speed and incredible force.

those slides showed evidence of catastrophic impact injury – 

impact injury that we believed 

was caused by a new kind of navy sonar, 

a sonic blast 

that did more than just scare whales into the shallows.

this sonar seemed to kill them.

dr. robertson: well, brian realized 

that we didn’t need the tissue to test our theory.

we have — noaa has — these arrays that record audio, 

marine life, seismic activity.

and one of these buoys was very close by.

so we know it was likely that we had recorded the whole event – 

the sonar blast, the whale reactions, everything.

well, first there was the sound of the whale vocalizations, 

which we expected.

and then there was what we now understand to be 

the priming of the sonar weapon.

[ horn blares ] 

and then there was a moment of silence.

and this proved to be the calm before the storm, 

because then it was “bam!” 

[ muffled explosion ] 

[ howling, screeching ] 

it was pretty awful to listen to.

brian was so preoccupied with cataloging this sonic blast 

that he almost missed what else was there.

[ howling, chattering ] 

there was another sound on the recording, an animal call, 

and we realized that this was a bloop signature, 

the same creature that noaa had recorded back in 1997.

but in this case, our recording was much longer.

it was the most complex, intricate animal call 

i’d ever heard.

and we had no idea what had made the sound.

all we knew was that a creature 

that had only been heard once in human history 

had just resurfaced.

[ person gasps ] 

is the government covering up proof of mermaids? 

later tonight, the conspiracy continues 

as we ask these questions and more 

during an interview with dr. paul robertson, 

where we’ll also reveal new evidence 

that has never been seen before.

stay tuned.

man: i’ve seen the footage 

that was supposedly taken in beaufort.

i don’t know if that particular video is real or not.

it doesn’t really matter.

the navy keeps a tight grip on all classified information.

but even they’ve come to realize 

that no matter what they do to prevent it, 

there will be occasional leaks.

and when there is a leak, 

they’ve learned how to control it.

it’s no surprise 

that the beaufort video was immediately branded a fake.

the navy tells us it’s not real, so it’s not real.

whenever a leak happens, 

the military has a way of using its influence 

to make the general public 

believe what they want them to believe.

what i can tell you is that i’ve seen a creature 

in the navy’s possession.

we took it after the first test in washington state.

i was on the beach that day, 

but we weren’t the first ones there.

narrator: in the months following 

the stranding in washington state, 

the noaa team responded to a sharp increase 

in mass beachings along both american coasts.

similar mass-beaching events were being reported 

all over the globe.

reporter: rescuers are racing against the clock, 

trying to save nearly 200 pilot whales 

that beached themselves in southern australia monday.

woman: [ speaking japanese ] 

reporter: six bottlenose dolphins also beached themselves, 

something scientists say is very uncommon.