Comrade Carney: The new Canadian PM

One of the ways one might examine how a republic becomes a communist state would be that it operates dialectically instead of in a Socratic or Aristotelian manner.

For example, in a Republic, you would typically have a set of fundamentals, axiomatic cultural statements which are codified in something like a Constitution. Then, the people would, through a transparent process, elect people by majority vote someone who they felt would best uphold those principles, such that society could consistently go forward with the individual ambitions each had, knowing there are consistent and fair rules in place and methods of adjudicating issues when someone feels that these rules have not been followed.

These axioms and fundamentals would be about equality before the law, and fair and transparent processes which protect individual rights. And processes such as trials and hearings would use empirical reality to determine the outcome of the process, even if one could not be properly determined, and the accused would be let go.

In a dialectic state, there is the inversion of process to result.

For example: Instead of having a Socratic style court room, where a complex process is established to try and establish the facts of an event and thereby determine guilt or innocence beyond a reasonable doubt, irrespective of the consequences to the state itself, its policies or ideally even its directors, in a communist state, processes are tuned dialectically in order to create a political outcome that protects state narratives. Assuming that Canada is such a polity now, we can say that when the verdict comes down for Dec. Helen Grus in her misconduct hearing, she will be found guilty despite there being zero evidence of guilt, a ton of evidence that she did exactly what she was paid to do, and all within the confines of her job description. Having attended several session of her hearing, as well as the hearings of many people connected to the Freedom Convoy and even watched several CPSO (College of Surgeons and Physicians of Ontario) all of those hearings had been conducted in a manner that showed that total reversal.

The verdict was established before the charge was ever laid, and the charge usually had little to do with the real reason for the hearings. The real reason always being challenging the state narrative. Like Covid measures or the mRNA shots. Increasingly, failing to consider Islam the Religion of Peace, or actually using science to challenge Global Warming Narratives will bring the same consequences.

This despite the fact that even the various government’s own statistical organizations have confirmed, along with many peer reviewed studies, that the mRNA shots cause a very high rate of death and heart disease, along with death and cancer amongst groups that normally would not suffer these things. And the overall rates are much higher than ever before.

But at this point, arguing the truth or falsities of state narratives is a trap. The real issue is that those narratives cannot be challenged in any effective or authoritative way.

Today, the last, or second last step in anointing Mark Carney as Canadian PM took place. Apparently he has to be sworn-in as the last step.

It was obvious all along that Mark Carney was going to be the next leader of the Liberals, but getting 86% of the vote on the 1st ballot is a total landslide.
The other three candidates should have just saved the $350k entry fee… it was that one-sided. https://t.co/IertIv4a3E

— Sports Niagara-AG (@SportsNiagara) March 9, 2025

But there are many questions surrounding the process for ‘electing’ him as Liberal leader. A great deal of party members claim they were not able to vote for reasons they did not understand, and only a small fraction of the people eligible to vote for for the leadership seemed able to vote at all.

This thread contains a lot of public sentiment and a few facts on the process. Some estimates are that 2/3rds of the registered voters were not able to vote.

But again, talking about how the election was rigged in some manner isn’t the point. It is that the entire system of a Republic as we have always thought of it to be, (albeit that we keep referring to it as a “democracy”) has been swapped out for a dialectical one in much the manner of a magician ripping a table cloth off a table and leaving all the cutlery and decorations in place. The support system was replaced. The decorations are the same.

And Canada, and perhaps especially Ontario, has so many state operated systems that should in fact be a mater of individual controls, that the amount of power a leader has is staggering. The LCBO, or Liquor Control Board of Ontario is the largest single purchaser of liquor in the world. So when Ford, acting as Trudeau’s Marionette, himself a marionette of the WEF/COMINTERN, decides to boycott American liquor he is acting for all the people in Ontario without any consultation. A boycott should be up to each individual, not the state. Especially for trivial reasons. All out war maybe. But either we are a free people or we are not. Those living near the Quebec border may want to drive over and stock up on US products if they have any intentions of remaining a free people. At least this is a peaceful way, and perhaps an enjoyable one, of working around another tyrannical move by Ford at the behest of the Feds.

I believe it was Doug Ford who once said, “You can have any kind of politics you want so long as it’s communism”.

But that would be a kind of financial form of Samisdat. A sneaky work around for communist measures which limit freedoms and eliminate our choices, which are rapidly becoming the norm in both small and enormous ways.

At some point, and the sooner it is done, the less draconian it has to be, we have to remove our content and authority from systems that operate for the people in name only. And we are going to start feeling that faster and sooner now that we have a New Trudeau in office but without the clown suit.