Measures Already In Place For Another Plandemic – Here’s The Evidence, Part III

Article posted with permission from the author, Suzanne Hamner

This is Part III in a three-part series. All references for the series are provided at the end.

Parts I and II illuminated the measures in place to perpetrate another planned scam-demic surrounding “influenza A viruses and influenza A viruses with pandemic potential” following the playbook of the CONvid-1984. In this final installment, measures to stop mRNA platform technology injections will be presented and how these measures fall short of protecting the people.

The introduction of mRNA or modified mRNA injections as a means to immunize against CONvid-1984 has created a firestorm of controversy, particularly when these interventions were found to be unsafe and ineffective. It was the first time this technology was used in human populations. Millions have been injured and disabled. Countless numbers have died. Yet, there is no indication the federal government will cease their use. In fact, the federal government is allocating hundreds of millions of dollars to create more.

• Buy All-American!
• Bring health and vitality back to your body with these non-transdermal patches
• Get your Vitamin B17 & Get 10% Off With Promo Code TIM
• How To Protect Yourself From 5G, EMF & RF Radiation – Use promo code TIM to save $$$
• The Very Best All-American Made Supplements On The Maret
• Grab This Bucket Of Heirloom Seeds & Save with Promo Code TIM
• Here’s A Way You Can Stockpile Food For The Future
• Stockpile Your Ammo & Save $15 On Your First Order
• Preparing Also Means Detoxifying – Here’s One Simple Way To Detoxify
• The Very Best Chlorine Dioxide
• All-American, US Prime, High Choice Grass-Fed Beef with NO mRNA, hormones or antibiotics… ever!

In response, several States are proposing legislation to stop these mRNA platform technology injections and some counties have adopted resolutions to halt these products from being used. But, this does not solve the problem with mRNA platform technology being used.

The proposed legislation in the State of Kentucky (HB 469) stops anyone from administering by any modality any human gene therapy product used for infectious disease, whether it be called a vaccine, an immunization or any other term. It allows gene therapy, which modified mRNA or mRNA platforms are, to be administered in the treatment of cancer or genetic disorder. Moreover, this proposed legislation has a sunset date of 2035, unless the General Assembly extends it. Why only ten years? And, why just stop administration? Moreover, there is no penalty for someone administering the mRNA product for infectious disease to another. Even if this law passes, it doesn’t stop mRNA products only administration of those products. And, it doesn’t include a penalty for violation nor provides the harmed individual from seeking justice against the violator. The bill carves out an exemption for mRNA products to be used to treat cancer or genetic disorders. In other words, it does not “ban” the mRNA products from being utilized in the State.

Could this ten year pause in “administration of the mRNA products” be a measure to allow mRNA platform technology to be developed for State-mandated childhood vaccines using conventional technology to be exhausted? At that point, would mRNA platform technology exist for all mandated childhood injections to attend public indoctrination centers?

We know that Moderna received $590 million from the federal government to develop multiple injections for several iterates of bird flu, including H5N1 and H7N9, which fall under the emergency declaration updated July 24, 2024, that activates the military operation in the PREP Act. Does anyone really think these products will sit on shelves because of State legislation stopping administration only without any force for noncompliance backing it up?

The proposed Montana bill (HB 371) reads very similar to Kentucky’s HB 469, except Montana provides a penalty for administration. Violators of the Montana proposed bill would be guilty of a misdemeanor, fined $500 for each incident, and their licensure would be up for review by the appropriate licensing board. Where is the due process for the person violated? What happens if administration of the mRNA product caused the death of the person? Are we to assume the violator would be charged with a misdemeanor only or would additional laws be applicable? The bill does not say. Again, the products are not banned, only administration of the product. The penalty for violation is frail at best. The legislature of Montana has rejected this bill.

The proposed bill in Iowa (SB 360) reads just like the proposed Montana bill. No further discussion needed.

The proposed Idaho bill (SB 1036) only provides for a moratorium on mRNA platform technology for administration. A moratorium is a temporary suspension of activity until further investigation is concluded. But, again, there is no penalty in place for violation. In other words, the proposed law has no force behind it. Just like the other bills, treatment for cancer and genetic disorders are exempted.

The proposed legislation in South Carolina (SB 343) does not ban mRNA technology nor does it stop administration of mRNA products. This proposed legislation only regulates what is required to be disclosed to the recipient of the product in the informed consent process, which should have always been the case when any medical intervention is performed. At least, those administering these products should have been providing the information contained in the propose bill to recipients at the outset of availability of these products to the public. This is a nothing burger. Informed consent is more than just a signed piece of paper. Many of the dangers of mRNA platform technology are not even mentioned – shedding, adverse events, and potential for incorporation into DNA. One can almost guarantee that what is indicated in the “law” will be all that is provided to recipients if the current state of informed consent with conventional vaccine technology is the standard, which is nothing but eliciting a “yes or no” answer to the question of “Do you want to get your flu shot today?” Or, in the case of infants, there is no question, just the statement, “it’s time for the 2-month round of vaccines so we’ll be doing that at the visit today.”

The proposed Texas legislation (SB 119) only addresses the labeling of food and meat containing mRNA platform technology injections. The only reference to legislation that proposed to “ban mRNA injections in Texas was Rep. Wes Virdell “offering” to put such a proposed bill on the docket.

Boise County Idaho passed a “resolution” calling for informed consent, supporting legislation “that investigates, or requires informed consent, that may recall, or may create corporate liability for products that use mRNA, DNA, or any genetic technology for human pharmacological use or consumption, use regarding any livestock, or use regarding any agricultural products that may adversely affect human health, animal health, or the food supply thereof;” prohibits mandates, food labeling if containing mRNA platform technology, etc. The “resolution” has no force in law; it is a statement of opinion only.

According to Children’s Health Defense, “Republican Party committees in Lexington County, South Carolina, and Scotland County, North Carolina, passed resolutions last year banning the mRNA shots.” As previously mentioned, a resolution is a statement of opinion only. In this case, the mRNA shots should be banned. However, it has no force in law. While these committees opine the mRNA shots should be banned, they have enacted no law to do so.

The only proposed legislation that could be found for Tennessee was SB 0260, which addresses labeling of meat when mRNA platform technology is NOT used on the food animal. For reference, the mRNA platform technology injection “Sequivity”, developed by Merck in 2018 for influenza A viruses, porcine circovirus, and rotavirus in swine, is being used by numerous pork producers around the country. And, these pork producers are keen on continuing use of these mRNA platform technologies in their animals.

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) has called on the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to “revoke appeal” of the CONvid-1984 modified mRNA gene therapy bioweapon shot; however, no legislation at the federal level has been forthcoming from Massie to ban the products for use in humans and animals.

There truly is no disconnect at the State level or the federal level when it comes to traditional vaccines or mRNA platform technology injections. While States and some at the federal level may huff and puff about mRNA platform technology injections and contamination, they remain loyal “vaccine” cultists since traditional vaccines used on our children were trialed using no placebo control. Fauci admitted it and so did Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. In fact, RFK Jr. indicated placebo control trials were not indicated for these traditional products even though they were never trialed using a placebo control. These are traditional platform technology vaccines that are “mandated” by every State for children to attend the public indoctrination centers, aka schools.

Right now, the “best” that is being offered is “suspension of CONvid-1984 modified mRNA gene therapy bioweapon shots until ‘retested’”. This is the proposal of Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, nominated to head the National Institute of Health (NIH). RFK, Jr., now Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, says he is “open” to “axing” the mRNA platform technology bioweapons IF data supports it. The data does support it, but those who have been walking around in the “stop the mRNA shots” crowd are now backpedaling since they are part of the federal machine. As many individuals at Children’s Health Defense, which RFK Jr. was CEO until recently, have documented traditional vaccine injury and death as well as mRNA platform technology bioweapon injury and death, has highlighted the problem with childhood vaccine mandates, yet, those in positions at the federal government (RFK Jr. and Bhattacharya) can only offer suspensions until “retesting” or axing “IF” data supports it for anything.

While many may call for a “ban” on mRNA platform technology regarding the CONvid-19 modified mRNA gene therapy bioweapon, don’t look for legislation at any level to “ban” the products. The technology is continuing to be developed and the measures are in place to implement another planned scam-demic following the same playbook as CONvid-1984.

It is going to be up to the people to stop this madness through civil disobedience with mandates of any type of injectable product for “viruses” and work to remove State mandates. The mRNA platform technology genie is out of the bottle and guaranteed, this technology will end up replacing conventional traditional platform vaccines on the recommended childhood vaccine schedule. It is being witnessed with the H5N1. There are traditional conventional platform vaccines approved by the FDA (four products) in the national stockpile that are going to be replaced with mRNA platform technology because national stockpile for H5N1 is “old technology”. Animal vaccines using the traditional platform will be changing as well to mRNA platform technology – it has started with Sequivity.

All anyone ever hears about is “getting exemptions” from mandates. Mandates violate the recognized rights enshrined in the Ninth Amendment to the Constitution for the united States of America – you have the right to control what goes into your body. No government can dictate that. Then, people start throwing around Jacobson vs. Massachusetts, which they claim gives the States the authority to “mandate” vaccines. Jacobson is an erroneous Supreme Court ruling 100 years ago that States used inappropriately to violate the rights of the people. Ask yourselves this, “if a State has authority to mandate medical intervention regarding childhood and other vaccines, why would they not have authority to mandate heart medication, chemotherapy, gene therapy, gall bladder surgery, etc.?” As a reminder, a “pandemic” or “epidemic” does not suspend or remove any rights of the people. A mandate means you have no right to refuse which violates the right to informed consent – a right also protected under the Ninth Amendment.

Vaccines and mRNA platform technology are products; products that pharmaceutical companies enjoy immunity from liability for harm caused by these products. No other companies enjoy this “privilege” given to them unconstitutionally by the federal government. This immunity from liability is another hurdle that has to be removed.

The pieces of the chessboard are being maneuvered now for another scam-demic similar to CONvid-1984. Only you can protect yourselves. No one is coming to the rescue so make your plans accordingly. If it’s not the influenza A viruses or influenza A viruses with pandemic potential, it will be something else that conform to the military operation seen with CONvid-1984.

Stay vigilant and do your own research. Leopards, when in federal, State, or local government service, tend to change their spots.

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/07/24/2024-16247/declaration-of-emergency-pursuant-to-the-federal-food-drug-and-cosmetic-act

https://sonsoflibertymedia.com/us-government-lawlessly-awards-millions-to-moderna-for-mrna-h5n1-injections-who-didnt-see-this-coming/

https://sonsoflibertymedia.com/rfk-jr-indicates-new-surveillance-for-vaccine-injury-needed-but-fails-to-address-other-issues-with-vaccines/

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/kentucky-montana-idaho-states-looking-ban-mrna-vaccines/

https://x.com/ValerieAnne1970/status/1891019878104015038

https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1891690382779470104

https://debbielerman.substack.com/

https://sonsoflibertymedia.com/new-dossier-convid-tyranny-was-international-military-op-not-public-health-video/

https://debbielerman.substack.com/p/the-covid-dossier

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/08/15/2022-17503/office-of-the-secretary-emergency-use-authorization-monkeypox-virus-vaccine

https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-issues/mpox

https://expose-news.com/2025/02/19/bird-flu-they-are-re-running-the-covid-script/

https://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/canada-reports-an-outbreak-of-h5n5-bird-flu-in-backyard-flock

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pfizer-ceo-albert-bourla-big-pharma-liability-shield-false-claims/

https://brownstone.org/articles/bird-flu-is-a-rerun-of-the-covid-playbook/

https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USFDA/bulletins/3a11cc1

https://www.fda.gov/food/alerts-advisories-safety-information/investigation-avian-influenza-h5n1-virus-dairy-cattle

https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/in-vitro-diagnostics/influenza-diagnostic-tests

https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/ostrich-status-update

https://www.outkick.com/analysis/experts-running-covid-playbook-again-mask-mandates-return

https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/AHFSS/Animal_Health/HPAI.html

https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/not-safe-and-not-effective

Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media