Aboyne No 2 WMO 03080 – Another Foehn Classic
The Met Office publishes these daily “extremes” both on their regular website and also highlights them on their “X” (formerly Twitter) Feed. These bulletins only cover “Climate Reporting” sites appearing on this list which means the readings are included in the compilation of the national historic temperature record. In the case of many Scottish and Welsh stations this means rare weather events untypical of the wider area are included even though they bear no relationship to the overall climate. Aboyne is notorious for rare weather events.
Tim Channon briefly reviewed this WMO site back in 2012 and assessed either as Class 1 or 2. I normally accept his judgement but in this case I feel he unusually overlooked the topography as well the highly variable nature of the surroundings. The image below is from 2010.
57.075875 -2.841039 Met Office CIMO Assessed Class 4 Temperature records from 1/1/1994
This is the site of a gliding club and they generally go for hilly terrain to pick up “thermals” as depicted in the Ordnance survey sheet of the area. The weather station is at 140 metres amsl whilst the nearby triangulation point indicates 256 metres.
The screen though on the flat sits at the very bottom level of a considerable slope and is subject to the Foehn effect. This article details when the national January highest temperature record set at Aboyne was broken by Kinlochewe and adds a handy explainer of the known Foehn effect cause.
Aboyne and other remote Scottish locations such as Achfary and Cassley are regularly picking up national daily highs based solely on these transient effects. The issue is, should these be included in the national records for climate reporting purposes? Obviously the current Met Office feels they should and almost relentlessly gives undue focus to them, however, would anyone actually want to book a winter holiday for warm temperatures based on such relatively unusual events. The Guardian newspaper even ran an article on this issue regarding North Wales some years back rightly suggesting it would not be too smart an idea based on such rare events.
The conditions at Aboyne do not stop with this susceptibility to Foehn winds, the site itself is now very poor indeed. Leaving aside the obvious concern regarding the comings and goings of glider trailers in close proximity to the screen it is now suffering from neglect of the overgrowth. Early Street-view images show a reasonably open site as below.
It is just possible to make out the screen to the right of the pole mounted transformer. As time has moved on though, the lack of vegetation control (whoever’s responsibility that may be) has caused the screen to be almost entirely enclosed in similar style to Plymouth Mountbatten.
This is rather a case of “now you see it, now you don’t” largely dependent on season, airfield activity and roadside vegetation management – not a good site to be taking readings for climate history purposes.
Aboyne is yet another typical example of the 49% of all Met Office weather stations that only make “Class 4 (additional estimated uncertainty added by siting up to 2 °C)” Added to these are the 29% that are ranked “Class 5 (additional estimated uncertainty added by siting up to 5 °C)” and the 8% that are ranked “Class 3 (additional estimated uncertainty added by siting up to 1 °C)” Overall 87% of all Met Office sites are below an acceptable standard for climate reporting despite the statement “Every fraction of a degree temperature increase has a real impact on our lives and our planet. Prof. Celeste Saulo, WMO Secretary-General”
Nevertheless the Met Office can proclaim records, tipping points and thresholds crossed with 100% certainty……because they say so.
Source: https://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2025/04/01/aboyne-no-2-wmo-03080-another-foehn-classic/
