Stephen Coughlin thread on the tactical use of “Islamophobia” now of growing importance with UK new laws

Six part Stephen Coughlin thread on X on the critically important use of the term, “Islamophobia” as a catch all to censor all non-revolutionary speech.

Here is Tweet 1/6 but click through for the whole thread.

I decided to reproduce the entire thread here because it is very good and people should see it as its importance to Western Civ has gone up several notches since various Western countries are now implementing Sharia law, even if they disguise it in Marxist language. But Please do click through if you have an X account and re tweet it so that as many as possible can read this thread.

Remember, Hate-speech is just the Marxist equivalent of Islamic Blasphemy laws, but with MUCH wider applications, and not nearly as specific.

1) Islamophobia has no definition – by design. When a term is manufactured to impose one’s will on others that lacks definition, it is a warning that it can mean anything or nothing at all. Stated differently, it means whatever the state wants it to mean.

Hence, the failure to… https://t.co/vpGip96M5G

— Stephen Coughlin (@S_Coughlin_DC) February 4, 2025

Full text of Tweet 1:

1) Islamophobia has no definition – by design. When a term is manufactured to impose one’s will on others that lacks definition, it is a warning that it can mean anything or nothing at all. Stated differently, it means whatever the state wants it to mean.

Hence, the failure to define is a FEATURE, not a FLAW in the drafting

Islamophobia is designed to be interactively interoperable with the intersectional Marxist term “Racism.” Islamophobia is designed to impose Islamic speech laws against non-Muslims in non-Muslim lands.

Check out “Warning on Racism” (word Search “Blair” – and related) –

Tweet 2:

2) At an OSCE Meeting in Warsaw, Poland, in 2013,(below), I directly intervened to get the status on Islamophobia straight from the official horses’ mouths that Islamophobia lacks a definition along lines developed by the OIC and UK-based (the still EU) Marxists (Runnymede Institute) for implementation through international lines.

The Marxist left and the IM have used international forums to introduce, socialize, normalize and then enforce their vocabulary along extra-legal lines while sounding “rule-of-law-ish.” Today, the international language of diplomacy is Marxist in design and intent.

Towards the end, that’s yours truly securing the definition and meaning of Islamophobia from official OIC releases, drafters, and leaders for use in OSCE functions. There is no speculation about Islamophobia – nor its hostile intent.

National leaders who fail to account for this, and even use the term against fellow American citizens, impose Islamic speech laws on U.S. (and N. American, and EU) on American citizens inside the United States – whether they know it or not.

Check it out, this is how the subversion sausage is made (The Runnymede Institute is the Marxist entity that manufactured the term “Islamophobia” in its current use):

Tweet 3:

Tweet 3)

In May 2015 in Vienna, Austria, at an official opening forum of the OSCE, we got the official panel to expressly state that saying something known and stipulated to be true can constitute “hate speech.” Hate speech is the Marxist term that Islamophobia is designed to be fully interactive and interoperational with at international, national, and local levels. (It drives the “Palestinian” branded street action on American campuses and streets today).

To be clear, when the UK PM commits to imposing Islamophobia mandates on UK citizens inside the UK, they are engaged in a deliberate effort to supersede UK law in favor of facially neutrally stated Islamic law on slander against those same UK citizens. And it’s a civil rights catastrophe.

KNOW WHAT YOU SEE:

Tweet 4.

It’s a “Dialogue and Praxis” thing. Impose the language and use it, you will become it. Adopt the language of Marxism; YOU WILL EXECUTE the Marxist agenda even when you erroneously believe you’re using it to contest it. The opportunity cost of using the Marxist terms developed to implement Marxist mass lines is that you’re not using your language, and you’re not using the language of freedom. It’s just that simple. (Sorry, but the video is down, but the transcript is still posted)

Tweet 5.

 This is what Islamophobia implements.

The Islamic Law that Islamophobia executes through facially neutral language is that of Islamic notions of slander – which ARE NOT Western notions of the same.

As I explained this back in 2012 when, having just been purged from DOD (again), I put together a makeshift office in my basement. The following was cut in those circumstances, here, to explain Islamic slander laws. (Yes, not looking my best but WT . . .)

Tweet 6.

 BTW, Islamophobia laws (“Defamation of Religions” [where only one religion can be defamed]) is what al-Issa is currently socializing to great effect on all those friendly speaking tours, including with the Marxist head of the UN and religious leaders who ought to know better.

Al-Issah runs the Wahhabi World Muslim League (WML)
that is under the direct control of Saudi Arabia and operates in conjunction with KSA policy and OIC guidance.

When interfaith, the Left, and militantly gullible say “building bridges,” force yourself to draw a solid (not a dotted) line to Qutb’s controlling meaning of that phrase.